Why Was Apache Spark Developed?

Before Spark, big data processing was powerful but painfully slow and fragmented. The Hadoop MapReduce model had several drawbacks that limited its efficiency and flexibility.

So, a group of researchers at UC Berkeley’s AMPLab set out to build a better engine—and Apache Spark was born.

 

Let’s look at the key reasons behind Spark’s development:

  • MapReduce Was Too Slow – MapReduce relied heavily on disk I/O between steps, which slowed down complex workflows.
  • Spark’s Fix: Spark introduced in-memory computing, allowing data to stay in memory between operations—making it up to 100x faster for iterative and interactive tasks.

    •  

  • Complex and Repetitive Coding – Hadoop development required writing a lot of boilerplate code in Java, even for basic operations.
  • Spark’s Fix: Spark made development easier with high-level APIs in Python, Scala, Java, and SQL, reducing code complexity and improving productivity.

    •  

  • Limited Workload Support – MapReduce was designed for batch processing only. It struggled with real-time, machine learning, and graph processing tasks.
  • Spark’s Fix: Spark offers a unified engine that supports:
  • Batch processing
  • Real-time streaming
  • Machine learning
  • Graph processing

    •  

  • Too Many Tools to Manage – In Hadoop, teams needed different tools for different workloads—like Hive for SQL, Storm for streaming, Mahout for ML, etc.
  • Spark’s Fix: Spark simplifies everything by combining major workloads into a single, scalable framework, reducing operational complexity.

    •  

    Spark vs Earlier Systems: Key Improvements:

    Challenge

    MapReduce Solution

    Traditional DB Solution

    Spark Solution

    Processing Speed

    Disk-based (slow); many intermediate writes

    Fast for single queries; slow to scale

    In-memory (fast); minimal disk I/O

    Scalability

    Horizontal (add machines)

    Vertical (add resources to one machine)

    Horizontal with high efficiency

    Data Types

    Only structured data

    Only structured data

    Structured, semi-structured, unstructured

    Real-Time Needs

    Not designed for streaming

    Not designed for streaming

    Built-in streaming support

    Machine Learning

    Very inefficient (many disk writes)

    Limited ML capabilities

    Optimized for iterative algorithms

    Developer Experience

    Complex API; steep learning curve

    SQL is easy; limited to SQL

    High-level APIs + SQL + Python/Scala

    Unified Workloads

    Requires separate tools

    Not applicable

    All workloads in one framework

     

    💡 Fun Facts

    •   Apache Spark was built as a response to developer frustration with MapReduce’s limitations at UC Berkeley.

    •   The name “Spark” reflects the speed and reactivity the team envisioned for big data processing.

    •   Early Spark benchmarks showed 10x–100x speedups compared to Hadoop for iterative tasks like machine learning.

    Leave a Reply